▸ spek → build → own

Your AWS platform shouldn't be the thing deciding your roadmap.

Your engineers deploy on demand, on a platform they own. We get you there with fixed-scope blueprints, merged as pull requests into your repos. The work ends when your team ships without us and our access is revoked.Your engineers deploy on demand, on a platform they own. We get you there with fixed-scope blueprints, merged as pull requests into your repos. The work ends when your team ships without us and our access is revoked.

Book the 30-min review → Take the 30-sec check →

You leave with a written spek — what your roadmap is blocked on, a fixed scope, and a timeline for your estate. Yours whether or not you use us.

100%infrastructure as code → owned by you speko7 fixed-scope blueprints · yours to own Principal-level AWS engineeringno juniors · no handoffs
{{ azAnnounce }}
# the ceiling

Every team hits the ceiling. Where do you stand?

Only 19% of teams reach DORA's elite tier. Against the slowest 25%, they make 182× more deployments a year. Which curve are you on?

the ceiling   the foundation decision solid foundation elite: 19% of teams — 182× more deploys/year weak foundation low: 25% of teams — DORA's 182× baseline company scale →

# DORA 2024, performance clusters · DORA 2025 · foundation first → then AI compounds for you.

Self-assessment · 3–6 taps {{ azProgressLabel }}
no email · no signup · instant verdict
{{ s.q }}
# the tier comes from two measures only — deploy frequency and lead time, scored against the clusters in DORA 2024 (context: DORA 2025). The rest shape the recommendation, not the tier.
# your verdict · {{ azIntentLabel }}

{{ azVerdictTierName }}

{{ azVerdictLine }}

foundation
middle
high
elite
you are here
# the path: {{ azPathLine }}
# {{ azRecLabel }}: {{ azAccName }} — {{ azAccLine }}
# the math · DORA measures
{{ r.dim }} — {{ r.ans }}{{ r.cluster }}
tier = the lower of the two · DORA 2024 clusters
# context · shapes the recommendation
{{ r.dim }} — {{ r.ans }}
# capabilities

Everything your platform needs.

{{ radarActiveNum }} {{ radarActiveTitle }}
{{ s.num }} {{ s.title }}
{{ radarActiveNum }} / 06

{{ radarActiveTitle }}

{{ radarActiveDesc }}

{{ radarActiveDetail }}

▸ {{ st.x }}
{{ sv.x }}
{{ d.label }}
View capability →
06 / 06 — what we build
{{ c.num }} {{ c.title }} {{ c.desc }} See how they are packaged →

Not sure which of these you need first? That is what the review is for.

Book the 30-min review →
# hard to copy

The engagement ends with our access revoked.

Your engineers ship a change through the platform without us, and our keys are deleted while you watch. A condition of the engagement, not a promise at the end of it.

iac pipelines agents your build debugged in production · sharpened every build
01
Blocks that compound

Your build starts on IaC, pipelines, and agents already debugged in production — not a blank repo.

speko keys your team runs it from here speko@your-aws access revoked ✓
02
We revoke our own access

IAM users, roles, SSO grants — gone on the last day. Coming back means a new engagement, not a renewal you couldn't get out of. That is what zero lock-in means here.

182× elite vs low, deploys/yr DORA 2024 ✓ checkable, or we cut it
03
Every number auditable

The benchmarks cite DORA. The self-assessment shows its math. If a number on this site can't be checked, we cut it.

Book the 30-min review →
# the pattern · watch it build

From one shared account
to an organization.

Blast radius contained by design.

BEFORE 1 account EC2 S3 RDS SageMaker one blast radius org + IaC AFTER AWS Organization Prod Non-prod Shared services Security Sandbox
5accounts in the org
100%infrastructure as code
every repoCI/CD in place
see the accelerators →

Want this shape on your own account? Thirty minutes is enough to say what it would take.

Book the 30-min review →

accelerate.

they're not faster — their foundation is. guardrails first, then AI compounds.
# grounded, not guessed

AI you can trust in production.

DORA surveyed nearly 5,000 technology professionals in 2025: 90% use AI at work. What they got back depended on the platform underneath.

# ai's effect on performance, by platform quality
platform quality: low
“negligible effect”
platform quality: high
“strong and positive”
verbatim — DORA 2025, platform engineering chapter
Anyone can wire CI/CD. The delivery system around it is what AI compounds.

Platform first, then agents. Which order yours needs is a 30-minute conversation.

Book the 30-min review →
# pick a mode — the terminal switches with it
Automated docs Agentic workflows Knowledge bases (RAG) Code-review agents Business-process automation Claude skills for devs
read: grounded, not guessed →
speko@ci — docs-agent · {{ aiTermTitle }}
$ git commit -m "add rate limiter"
▸ docs-agent: reading diff — 4 files changed
▸ understood: RateLimiter middleware, config, tests
✓ updated docs/api/rate-limiting.md
✓ knowledge base in sync — safe to merge
$ git commit -m "add rate limiter"
▸ docs-agent: no repo access — answering from priors
▸ assumed: Express middleware, 100 req/min, redis store
✎ wrote docs/api/throttling.md
✓ docs updated — looks consistent
{{ aiTermNote }}
# a gate opens when its condition is true — not when a date arrives

Five gates you can check yourself.

How long each one takes depends on where you are starting. What “done” means does not.

spek
01 spek
we can name, in writing, what your roadmap is blocked on — and you keep the document either way
build
02 accounts
prod, non-prod, shared services, security and sandbox are separate accounts under one organization
03 as code
any environment can be rebuilt from the code in your repo — nothing that runs was clicked into a console
04 delivery
every repo deploys through the same pipeline, and every release has a rollback path
own
05 own
your engineers have shipped a change through it without us — and our access is revoked
You leave with a written spek — what your roadmap is blocked on, a fixed scope, and a timeline for your estate. Yours whether or not you use us.
Book the 30-min review →